نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار ژئومورفولوژی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشجوی دکتری ژئومورفولوژی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران (نویسنده مسئول).

3 دانشجوی دکتری ژئومورفولوژی، دانشگاه، تهران، ایران.

4 کارشناس ارشد هیدروژئومورفولوژی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

چکیده
در ایران آب بسیاری از شهرها خصوصاً مناطق غربی از طریق منابع کارست تأمین می‌شود. بر این اساس در تحقیق حاضر به ارزیابی توسعه فرایندها و آبخوان­های کارستیک در حوضه­ ی قره ­سو پرداخته شده است. این تحقیق مبتنی بر روش­های میدانی، ابزاری و کتابخانه­ای است که به‌ منظور تعیین مناطق کارستیک توسعه­یافته در حوضه­ ی قره­ سو از 8 عامل: سنگ­ شناسی، گسل، شیب توپوگرافی، جهت­شیب، ارتفاع، رودخانه، بارش و اقلیم (دما و رطوبت) استفاده شده است. برای این منظور ابتدا با استفاده از روش نرم­افزاری (ARC GIS و IDRISI) اقدام به تهیه­ی لایه­های اطلاعاتی شده است. پس از تهیه­ی لایه­ های اطلاعاتی، این لایه­ ها بر اساس نظر کارشناسان وزن­دهی و سپس با استفاده از مدل ANP استانداردسازی شده­اند، سپس با استفاده از دو مدل منطق فازی و میانگین گیری وزن­دار ترتیبی نقشه­هایی نهایی حاصل شده است. بر پایه نتایج حاصل از عوامل موثر در توسعه یافتگی کارست، حوضه­ی مورد مطالعه از نظر میزان توسعه­یافتگی به 5 طبقه­ی زیاد، نسبتاً زیاد، متوسط، کم و خیلی کم تقسیم شده است. با تـوجه به اینکه در روش مـنطق فازی و میانگین­گـیری وزن­دار تـرتیبی (OWA) اختلاف­هایی در تلفیق و ترکیب لایه­های اطلاعاتی وجود دارد، نتایج نهایی دارای اختلافاتی از نظر وسعت طبقات هستند به طوری که در روش OWA به دلیل این­که تعدیل بیش­تری صورت می­گیرد اختلاف طبقات کم­تر از روش منطق فازی است اما روند کلی میزان توسعه­یافتگی در هر دو روش تقریباً منطبق بر هم است و میزان توسعه­یافتگی از شمال و شمال شرق به سمت جنوب و جنوب غرب کاهش می­باید.

تازه های تحقیق

-

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Determination of the Developed Karst Regions Using Fuzzy Logic and OWA Models in Qaresou Basin

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amir Sasfari 1
  • Hamid Ganjaeian 2
  • Zahra Heidary 3
  • Mojdeh Fraidoni Kordestani 4

1 Associate Prof. Geomorphologhy, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

2 - Ph.D. Candidate of Geomorphologhy, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author), E-mail:h.ganjaeian@ut.ac.ir.

3 Ph.D. Candidate of Geomorphologhy, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran

4 M.A. Hydrogeomorphologhy, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Wide areas of dry and non-glacier lands of the earth are covered with carbonate formations prone to karstic. Indeed, about 20 to 25% of the world's population live in karstic areas or get their water requirement from karstic water resources. Karstic areas are important because of the following reasons. Firstly, they have an important role in providing and feeding aquifers. The karstic aquifers have also high heterogeneity and spatial diversity in terms of the development of karstic. In addition, they are formed in various forms and developed in karstic regions. For regions such as Iran which does not have enough water resources and 11% of its area covered with karstic, the issue is important. Due to the complex nature of karstic system, especially from the perspective of geomorphology, no models have been offered upon which all aspects of the system can be investigated. Due to the sensitive nature of a karstic system, in the planning of karstic areas, efforts have been made to develop the rate of change and sensitivity of karstic within the framework of the appropriate model or models. Accordingly, in this study using the OWA, fuzzy logic, and network analysis (ANP), the development of the processes and karstic aquifers are discussed in the Qaresou basin.
Methodology
This research was based on field, instrumental, and library techniques. Firstly, using the topographic maps, the basin area of ​​the study was determined. The main data of the research were topographic maps of 1: 50000, geological maps of 1:100,000 and satellite imagery. In this research, 8 factors including lithology, fault, slope, aspect, elevation, river, rainfall, and climate have been used to determine the areas susceptible to Karstic development in the Qaresou Basin. For this purpose, the first step was to prepare information layers using some software. In the last step, considering the parameters, the potential of the region for the development of the processes and the development of karstic aquifers was evaluated. For this purpose, two models of fuzzy logic and sequential weighted averaging (OWA), as well as an analysis network (ANP) model, were used for the zoning and weighting the information layers.
Results and discussion
The 8 parameters of elevation, slope, aspect, lithology, fault, climate, rainfall, and rivers were used in order to evaluate the development of karstic in the study area. In the lithology and climatic condition layers, the first class had the lowest value in the development of karstic regions and the upper classes had the highest value. In the lithology layer, the first class had formations which had less potential for permeability and the sixth class was calcareous layer with a great potential in this regard. In the climate classes, the first class had a semi-arid climate and had a low score, but the fifth class had a wet climate with a high score. The distance from faults and rivers showed that the areas near faults had a high potential to develop the karstic processes. The pattern of the slope and aspect indicated that the regions with the lowest slope as well as aspects to the north had the highest score. The pattern of the height and precipitation also suggested that areas with significant elevation and more precipitation had great potential in the development of the karstic processes. The pattern of distance from the river showed that the areas away from the river had higher potential and score.
Conclusion
Considering the parameters that were considered in order to evaluate the development of the processes and the karstic aquifers, as well as considering the criteria and sub-criteria, the final maps were obtained. Based on the results of the effective factors in the development of the Karstic, the studied basin is divided into five levels of high, relatively high, moderate, low, and very low development.
The evaluation of the final maps indicated that in both maps of the north and northeast regions of the basin there is more development. In addition, due to the favorable climatic, geomorphological, and geological conditions, a large part of the region has a high development that is why the studied basin has a high potential for karstic water resources. Considering that there are differences in fuzzy logic and sequential weighted average (OWA) methods in integrating and combining information layers, the final results have differences in terms of class size. Indeed, in the OWA method because there is more moderation, the difference between the classes is less than the fuzzy logic method, but the general trend of the development in both methods is almost consistent and the extent of development reduces from the north and northeast to the south and southwest.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: The Qaresuo basin
  • Fuzzy model
  • OWA model
  • ANP model
منابع
- آقانباتی، علی (1383)، زمین­شناسی ایران، انتشارات سازمان زمین­شناسی و اکتشافات معدنی کشور، 586 صفحه.   
- طالع جنکانلو، علی؛ طالعی، محمد و محمد کریمی (1394)، ارزیابی تناسب اراضی مسکونی به روش FUZZY، OWAو TOPSIS، نشریه­ی علوم و فنون نقشه‌برداری، دوره­ی 4، شماره­ی 4، صص 45-29.
- طالعی، محمد؛ سلیمانی، حسین و منوچهر فرج­زاده اصل (1393)، ارزیابی تناسب اراضی برای کشت دیم بر مبنای مدل فائو و با استفاده از تکنیک تلفیقی OWA-AHP و FUZZY در محیط ARCGIS (مطالعه­ی موردی: شهرستان میانه)، نشریه آب‌وخاک، جلد 28، شماره­ی 1، صص 156-139.
- معصوم­پور سماکوش، جعفر؛ میری، مرتضی و سجاد باقری سیدشکری (1395)، اثرتغییراقلیمبرآبدهیوویژگی­هایچشمه­هایکارستیاستانکرمانشاه، مجله­ی جغرافیا و پایداری محیط، شماره­ی 21، صص 65-51.
-All Sheikh, A., Soltani, M., Nouri, N., Khalilzadeh, M. (2008), Land Assessment for FloodSpreading Site Selection Using Geospatial Information System, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Vol .5, No.4, PP. 455-462
-Baryakh. A., Fedoseev, A., (2011), Sinkhole formation mechanism, Journal of Mining Science, Vol. 47, No. 4.
-Bosak, P. (2003), Karst Processes from the Beginning to the End: How Can They be Dated? Speleogenesis and Evolution of Karst Aqufers, 1(3) PP. 1-4.
-Florea, L. (2005), Using stste-wide gis data to identify the coincidence etween sinkhole and geologic structure, Journal of Cave and karst studies, Vol. 67, No.2, PP. 120-124.
-Ford, D.C. & Williams, S. (1989), Karst geomorphology and hydrology, Unwin Hyman, London, 601 P.
-Ford, D.C., Williams, P.W. (2007), Karst Hydrogeology and Geomorphology, Wiley, Chichester, PP. 562.
-Kumar, U., Kumar, B., Neha, M. (2013), Groundwater Prospects Zonation Based on RS and GIS Using Fuzzy Algebra in Khoh River Watershed, Pauri-Garhwal District, Uttarakhand, India. Global Perspectives on Geography (GPG), Vol. 1, PP. 37-45.
-Pike, R.J. (2002), Geomorphology–Diversity in quantitive surface analysis, progress in Physical Geography, 24, PP. 1-20
-Tirla, L., Vijulie, I. (­2013), Structural–tectonic controls and geomorphology of the karst corridors in alpine limestone ridges: Southern Carpathians, Romania, Geomorphology Journal, Vol. 197,