نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 پژوهشکده آبخیزداری

2 گروه زمین شناسی، واحد بندرعباس، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بندرعباس، ایران

چکیده

یکی از مهمترین متغیرهای هیدرولوژیکی در حوضه آبخیز شناخت دبی است. در این تحقیق از مدل جامع حوضه آبخیز سوات و مولفه‌های زمین شناختی برای شناخت بیلان آبی استفاده شده . در این مدل با ورود نقشه‌های طبقات ارتفاعی، کاربری اراضی و خاکشناسی از اطلاعات هواشناسی برای شبیه‌سازی یک دوره سی‌ساله (استفاده گردید. سپس در محیط سوات- کاپ اقدام به واسنجی مدل برای یک دوره 8 ساله و صحت‌سنجی سه ساله شد. برای ارزیابی، از معیارهای ضریب تعیین وزنی و ضریب کارایی ناش-ساتکلیف استفاده گردید. شاخص برای تخمین دبی در مرحله واسنجی 6/0 و صحت‌سنجی 51/0 بوده که نشان از دقت قابل پذیرش مدل دارد. براساس بیلان آبی، بیش از 72 درصد بارش تبخیر گردیده و رواناب حوضه 7/3 درصد است. جریان زیر قشری در جهت شیب، به سمت خروجی حوضه، 27/20 درصد و 93/1 درصد از بارش وارد سفره های مشترک آب زیرزمینی شده و تنها 12/0 درصد به عمق نفوذ می‌کند. به منظور بررسی اثر عوامل زمین ساختی و سنگ شناختی، از مولفه های شکستگی ها، جهت شیب لایه‌ها و لیتولوژی کلی واحدهای سنگی استفاده شد. هم راستا بودن شیب لایه بندی با جهت مسیر رودخانه زهکش کننده حوضه و وجود گسل لتیان در مسیر زهکش، تاثیر بسزایی در خروجی رودخانه دارد. همچنین براساس ساختار سنگ شناسی، پس از نفوذ بارش در لایه‌های سنگی، گسل‌ها آب را به صورت جریان زیر قشری منتقل می‌کنند. بخش اندکی از جریان، به سفره عمیق منتقل می‌شود. لذا می‌توان بیان کرد که جریان زیرقشری تامین کننده آب در حوضه رودک است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Action of Tectonic and Lithological Parameters in the Water Balance Of the Roodak basin

نویسندگان [English]

  • Alireza Habibi 1
  • Hamidreza Masoumi 2

1 محقق پژوهشکده آبخیزداری گروه مهندسی رودخانه و سواحل دکتری ژئئومورفولوژی

2 گروه زمین شناسی، واحد بندرعباس، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بندرعباس، ایران

چکیده [English]

1-Introduction
Many studies have been conducted on the water balance of watersheds based on the SWAT model, among which, one can mention the research of by Van Liew and Garbrecht (2003: 413-426), Neitch et al. (2005: 494), Abbaspour et al. (2007: 413-430), Rostamian et al. (2008: 977-988), Faramarzi et al. (2009: 486-510), Hoseini (2014: 63-73), Habibi et al. (2016: 275), Nadi et al. (2018: 61-79) and Ghazavi et al. (2018: 54-79). This research is based on the initial field observation and a question that, how much rainfall (rain and snow) transfer to groundwater with the performance of faults and rock units with high permeability? Therefore, according to the geological conditions, the Roodak basin upstream of the Latian dam was selected as the study area. So, SWAT model, field, and tectonic studies have been used to answer the research question. The Roodak basin has more than 420.41 square kilometers area.
2-Methodology
The statistical indices of R2 and Nash-Sutcliffe (NS) were used as the most important evaluation criteria to quantitatively evaluate the performance of the ARC_SWAT model in the calibration and validation stages. Calibration and analysis of model were used and performed SUFI2 algorithm in SWAT Cup software and flow data of Roodak hydrometric station. Calibration for the years (2000-2007) and validation based on the statistics of the years (2008-2011) was performed after stimulation using calibrated values for sensitive parameters. Then the basin water balance check was obtained. The relationship between rainfall and permeability has been investigated based on geological components such as fractures, faults, and lithology. Mosha-Fasham fault and Latian fault are the main faults of the study area. The main controller of tectonic activities in the area is the Mosha-Fasham fault and its sub-branches. The main branch of this fault as a thrust has passed through the middle part of the basin and has pushed the Paleozoic and Mesozoic formations on the younger formations. Also, its sub-branches have caused disruption in the geological structures with normal and inverse functions. The

 

northwestern part of the Latian fault is another important tectonic fracture of the Roodak basin and acts in the outlet parts of the basin. In this part, the Emameh River flows along the Latian Fault. The rock units of the region are divided based on field data and remote sensing studies of the 2019 Landsat 8 satellite image by Arc GIS software. From the lithological viewpoint, from old to new rocky and sedimentary units have respectively the following conditions. Red micaceous siltstone and sandstone of Zagoon Formation (Cz). Limestone and dolomitic lime, sandstone, and shale of Mila Formation (Com). Dark fossiliferous limestone and shale of Mobarak Formation (Cm). Oolitic limestone, thin-bedded shale and dolomitic limestone, and thick-bedded dolomite of Elika Formation (Tre). Grey shale and sandstone of Shemshak Formation (TRjs). Conglomerate, sandstone, and coaly shale of Shemshak Formation (Jk). Light grey massive limestone of Lar Formation (Jl). Light color massive orbitolina limestone of Tizkouh Formation (Ktzl). Polygenic red conglomerate and sandstone (Elc). Green tuff of Karaj Formation (Etu). Tuff with shale interbeds of Karaj Formation (Eksh). Dark green shale with tuff interbeds of Karaj Formation (Esh). Green tuff and Tuffy shale interbed of Karaj Formation (Ek). Red marl, gypsy marl, sandstone, and conglomerate of Upper red Formation (Mur). Recent sand and aeolian sand (Qsd).
3-Results and Discussion
After running the model, the outputs including runoff, subsurface flow, etc., were obtained as a text file. Using the results of model, sensitivity analysis were identified nine sensitive parameters among the total 17 parameters. By SUFI2 algorithm were determined the optimal values of the sensitive parameters of the model. The results showed that the snowmelt and snowfall temperatures are the sensitive parameters of the model. The share of surface runoff, lateral, and groundwater flow in the monthly flow of Roodak River is presented in Table 1.
Table (1): Water balance components of Roodak basi.





variable


Value (mm)


Percent relative to rainfall




Rain


585.67


100 




Evaporation & transpiration


427


72.75 




Water in the soil


10.44 


1.78 




Surface flow


18.49 


3.15




Subsurface flow


118.72 


20.27 




Groundwater flow


11.35 


1.93 




Deep infiltration


0.68 


0.12 





The upstream areas of the basin have rock units with a relatively high permeability in terms of physical and dissolution conditions, based on geological data including fault, fracture, and lithology information. These rock units include limestone and sandstone of the Paleozoic and Mesozoic formations. Therefore, the expected power for the downward flow is high in these areas. In the middle and downstream areas, the intrinsic permeability of rock units is relatively low, due to Tuffy and marly lithology. However, the transferring surface water to depth is accelerated due to the extensive tectonic fractures. In contrast, disrupts this transfer to depths and makes subsurface flow the effect of secondary fillings on fractures.
4-Conclusions
Generally, in simulating the Roodak basin flow the values of all indicators and the results of geological studies indicate the acceptable accuracy of the model. By running the ARC_SWAT model it was possible to simulate the monthly flow of the study period in this basin. Also, the statistical comparison has shown acceptable results. So the statistical comparison of simulation and observational hydrographs show a correlation of about 60% with the Nash-Sutcliffe criterion. This study provides useful information on the river flow and water balance of Roodak Basin and helps more accurately with water resources projects. The evapotranspiration potential (PET) is 1025.4 mm. The total water of the basin equal to 247.89 mm included surface runoff, groundwater, and lateral flow. Agricultural products temperature and water stresses were 129 and 80 days which calculated at the SWAT_ CHECK. Therefore, according to the simulation results, it can be inferred that the ARC_SWAT model has acceptable performance in the Roodak basin. Geological evidence indicates that the rock units have high permeability in upstream and low permeability in downstream areas. However, the results of the SWAT model showed that rainfall is flowing in the direction of the Emameh River slope in the form of subsurface flow. This is due to the action of Latian fault in the transfer of surface water to subsurface flow. Also, according to station data, water entering to Emameh River has the highest amount in winter and spring and the lowest level in late summer. Therefore, subsurface water as a base flow provides a significant part of the water in all months of the year. Surface runoff has a large share in the river flow from mid-autumn to early spring. Lateral flow accounts for a very small share of river flow in all months of the year. The simulation accuracy is acceptable in this research in comparison to the results with similar studies. The results of this study can

be used by examining the impact of land-use change with different scenarios to predict the effects of management planning and climate change due to rainfall.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Water balance
  • Geological components
  • subsurface flow
  • Roodak basin southeast of Tehran
Abbaspour, K. C., (2008). User Manual for SWAT-CUP2, SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis Programs.Swis Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Eawag, Duebendorf, Switzerland.95PP.
Abunada, Z. Kishawi, Y. Alslaibi, T. M. Kaheil, N. Mittelstet, A. (2021). The application of SWAT-GIS tool to improve the recharge factor in the DRASTIC framework: Case study. Journal of Hydrology. Vol 592, 125613 doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125613.
Alizadeh, M. Mirzaee Mohammadabadi, R. and Kia, H. (2016). Preparation of land use map using Landsat 8 satellite images (Jajroud Watershed). Geography and Environmental Sustainability. 6:89-98. (In Persian).
Ara, H. Yamani, M. and Shayan, S, Y. (2012). Management-Behavioral Analysis of Chaotic and Normal Landforms in Jajroud Watershed. Geography and Environmental Planning. 23(2): 3-52. (In Persian).
Borah, D.K., and Bera, M. (2004). Watershed-scale hydrologic and nonpoint source Pollution models: review of applications. Trans. ASAE 47:3.789-803.
Epelde, A. M. Cerro, I. Sánchez-Pérez, J. M.  Sauvage, S.  Srinivasan, R.  Antigüedad I. (2015). Application of the SWAT model to assess the impact of changes in agricultural management practices on water quality. Hydrological Science Journal. 60(5). 825-843.
Faramarzi. M, Abbaspour K.C, Schulin. H. (2009). Modelling blue and green water resources availability in Iran. Hydrological Processes, 23(3): 486–501.
Ghazavi, R. Nadimi, M. Omidvar, A. and Eemani, R. (2018). Investigating the impact of future climate change in Ardabil Herochai River using SWAT and LARS-WG models. Hydrogeomorphology. 15(4): 54-79. (In Persian).
Gholipour, S. and Moradi, M. (2011). Geological study and structural analysis of Lavasanat region (northeast of Tehran), the first national geological conference of Iran, Shiraz. (In Persian).
Gourabi, A. and Kiarostami, F. (2020). The effect of new tectonically movements on the shape of the basin (Case study of Roudak catchment). Quantitative Geomorphological Research. 9(1): 1-12. (In Persian).
Gourabi, A. and Kiarostami, F. (2015). Tectonic assessment of watershed using geomorphological features in the form of TecDEM model (Case study: Rudak catchment in northeast of Tehran). Natural Geography Research. 47(3): 465-479. (In Persian).
Habibi, A. Saffari, A. Karam, A. and Peyrovan, H. (2016). Investigation and simulation of runoff and sediment in semi-arid climate of Iran (Case study: Hablehroud Watershed), PhD thesis Kharazmi University. 275 pages. (In Persian).
Hoseini, M. (2016). Simulation of water balance in Qarahsu watershed, Kermanshah province using SWAT model, Water Resources Engineering. 9(30): 37-55. (In Persian).
Hoseini, M. Ghafoori, A. and Makarian, Z. (2013). Investigation of modeling of groundwater potential of waterways leading to the southern borders and Persian Gulf. Tehran: Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute Publications. 246 pages. (In Persian).
Hosseini, M. (2010). Effect of land use changes on water balance and suspended sediment yield of Taleghan Catchment, Iran. PhD Thesis, University Putra Malaysia, 226 pages.
IRIMO. (2011). Meteorological statistical data of Ahar, Fasham, Garmabdar and north of Tehran stations. (In Persian).
Koreae, M. and Kiani, Y. (1994). Seismicity of the Iranian plateau with a special focus on Tehran. GSI. 1-97. (In Persian).
Moravej, K. Karimian Eghbal, M. and Mahmoudi, S. (2012). Preparation of digital soil map using geomorphometric analyzes in a part of Jajroud river watershed. Ph.D thesis. Trabiat Modares University. 136 pages. (In Persian).
Naderi, M. Ildoromi, A. Nouri, H. Aghabeigi Amin, S. and Zeinivand, H. (2018). Investigating the Impact of Land Use and Climate Change on Watershed Runoff Using SWAT Model (Case Study: Green Basin). Hydrogeomorphology. 16(5): 61-79. (In Persian).
Nash, J.E., Sutcliffe, J.V. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models part 1, discussion of principals. Journal of Hydrology, 10(3): 282-290.
Neitch, S.L., J.G. Arnold, J.R. Kiniry and J.R. Williams. (2005). Soil and water assessment tool Documentation, user’s manual, Temple, Texas, USA, 494 pages.
Refahi, H, G. (2010). Water erosion and its control. Seventh edition. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. 671 pages. (In Persian).
Rostamian, R. Jaleh A. Afyuni, M. Mousavi, S.F. (2008). Application of a SWAT model for estimating runoff and sediment in two mountainous basins in central Iran. Hydrological Sciences. 53 .P:977-988.
Van Liew M.W., Garbrecht J., (2003). Hydrologic simulation of the Little Washita River experimental watershed using SWAT, Journal of the American Water Resources Association 39:413-426.