نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری مهندسی عمران، کارشناس حفاظت و بهره‌برداری، شرکت آب منطقه‌ای گلستان، گرگان، ایران

2 گروه مهندسی عمران، واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران

چکیده

هیدرولوژی حوضه رودخانه‌ها به شدت تحت تأثیر تغییرات اقلیمی و افزایش بیش از حد انتشار گازهای گلخانه‌ای قرار دارد. هدف از این پژوهش بررسی اثرات تغییر اقلیم بر شرایط اقلیمی حوضه آبریز گرگان‌رود در استان گلستان بوده که در آن مدل SWAT توسط الگوریتم SUFI-2 با هدف بهبود نتایج شبیه‌سازی دبی حوضه، مورد واسنجی و اعتبارسنجی قرار گرفت. مدل MIROC-ESM از سری مدل‌های گزارش پنجم هیئت بین دول تغییر اقلیم جهت بررسی اثرات تغییر اقلیم بر مؤلفه‌های هیدرو- اقلیمی حوضه و تحت چهار سناریوی انتشار به نام‌های 6/2، 5/4، 0/6 و 5/8 و در سه بازه زمانی آینده نزدیک (2050-2025)، میانی (2075-2051) و دور (2100-2076) مورد استفاده قرار گرفت؛ همچنین روند تغییرات حوضه با استفاده از آزمون من- کندال مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که تغییرات دما تحت سناریوی RCP4.5 در دوره زمانی آینده نزدیک و میانی و تحت سناریوی RCP6.0 و آینده میانی و دور از یک روند معنی‌دار افزایشی تبعیت کرده؛ به‌طوری‌که مؤلفه بارش در تمامی سناریوها از تغییرات کاهشی غیرمعنی‌داری پیروی می‌کند. همچنین، تغییرات رواناب تحت سناریوی RCP4.5 و در دوره‌های زمانی آینده میانی و دور و تحت سناریوی RCP8.5 و در آینده دور از روند معنی‌دار کاهشی تبعیت می‌نماید؛ به‌طورکلی، مقادیر دما در یک مسیر افزایشی پیش می‌رود، درحالی‌که مقادیر بارش و رواناب یک روند کاهشی را تا انتهای قرن 21 در حوضه دنبال می‌کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Hydro-Climatic Conditions of Gorganroud Catchment under the Effect of Climate Change using MIROC-ESM model

نویسندگان [English]

  • Alireza Donyaii 1
  • Amirpouya Sarraf 2

1 دکتری مهندسی عمران، کارشناس حفاظت و بهره‌برداری، شرکت آب منطقه‌ای گلستان، گرگان، ایران

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran

چکیده [English]

1- Introduction
Climate evolutionary theory reveals that climate change has already been evident in the planet's history, but when opposed to historical climate changes, the climatic changes of the last century have two unique characteristics. First, through the nature of the ongoing climate change, human actions play a significant role Second; the speed of recent climatic changes is greater, so that, many changes will be occurring in the Earth's atmosphere during a short term [Telmer et al. 2004]. Nowadays, global warming has significant effects on precipitation and runoff yield and water resources due to the increased concentration of greenhouse gases [Donyaii et al. 2020]. The average meteorological parameters, in particular the annual or seasonal components of temperature, precipitation and runoff, play a significant role in the hydrological cycle and are typically used as an indicator for climate change evaluation on the water supplies available to Iran now and particularly in the future [Donyaii et al. 2020]. Based on the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Models [AR4], a number of studies have been undertaken to examine the effect of climate change on the hydrological components of watersheds in Iran. In contrast with the Fifth Assessment Study [AR5] models, these models, along with older pollution scenarios, have limited resolution. Therefore, in the watersheds of Iran, climate change experiments with higher resolution climate models under the latest pollution scenarios [RCPs] of the AR5 seem appropriate. According to historical evidence of Gorganroud's high flood capacity in the province of Golestan, Iran, the recognition of the impact of climate change on the watershed's hydrological regime is important for water resource planners.
2- Methodology
2-1- Study area and data set
The Gorganroud Watershed is located in Golestan Province, Iran. In this study, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool [SWAT] was employed for hydrological simulation of the

 

watershed based on the downscaled outputs [using the Bias Correction and Spatial Disaggregation [BCSD] method] of fifth assessment report climate change model [MIROC-ESM] for historical and future periods. The trend analysis of hydro-climatic records was done according to the non-parametric Mann-Kendall test. The future projection was conducted for the near [2025-2050], mid [2051-2075], and far [2075-2100] future periods related to historical records in the period of 1985-2005.
2-2- SWAT set-up and calibration, validation and uncertainty analysis
In this study, runoff was estimated using the Soil Conservation Service [SCS] method. The Manning equation and Muskingum method were utilized to calculate flow velocity and routing phase, respectively. On the other hand, the SUFI-2 algorithm was employed to calibrate and analyze the sensitivity, and uncertainty of the SWAT model. The sensitivity analysis is based on linear approximation and the degree of uncertainty is calculated by two factors called r-factor and P-factor. The calibration and validation were performed using runoff data in the periods of 1995-2015 and 2016-2019, respectively. The coefficients of determination [R2] and Nash-Sutcliffe [NS] were used as the objective function to determine the goodness of fitness.
2-3- Climate Change scenarios and AR models
In the AR5 new emission scenarios based on emission forcing level until 2100 were employed. In order to investigate the future climate change, the Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate-Earth System Models [MIROC-ESM] was selected among the newest extracted models presented in the AR5, because the result of this model in Gorganroud watershed showed the highest agreement with observational data. This model consists of four emission forcing scenarios [RCP2.6, RCP.4.5, RCP6.0 and RCP8.5.
3- Results and Discussion
3-1- SWAT sensitivity analysis, calibration and validation analysis
Seventeen parameters were chosen for SWAT sensitivity analysis using the 500 simulations of SUFI-2. Results showed that the parameters CN, SOL_BD and SOL_K have the highest relative sensitivity. Based on the results, the coefficients R2 and NS for runoff simulation were estimated to be 0.79-0.77 and 0.74-0.71 in the calibration and validation stage, respectively. Therefore, the results of the model are acceptable and its uncertainty metrics is satisfactory in general.
The study results showed that the model has estimated the amount of peak discharge less than the actual amounts, which is confirmed by the average monthly simulated

 

discharge during calibration and validation periods. The results also showed that more than 50% of the observational data in both calibration and validation phases are bracketed by the 95PPU uncertainty estimation band, which indicate a rather acceptable degree of certainty in simulation.
3-2- Climate change simulation results and trend analysis
In the near and mid-future, there are increasing changes under the RCP2.6 scenario, but the trends of rainfall are not statistically significant at the 5% level. In the far- future a significant increasing trend is observed under the RCP2.6 scenario, meanwhile in far-future under the RCP4.5 scenario there are increasing changes, but the trends are not statistically significant. In the mid and far future under the RCP6.0 scenario, a significant increasing trend has been observed. Finally, in the mid- future under the RCP8.5 scenario, there is a significant increasing trend. However, the increasing changes in the near and far-future periods are not statistically significant at the confidence level of 95%. The trend analysis of variables indicates that the amount of rainfall will decrease in this watershed during the future periods by the end of the 21st century. The most decreasing alterations in the rainfall and the highest increase in the temperature are achieved under the highest concentration of greenhouse gases [RCP8.5]. Moreover, in the near, mid, and far future, the runoff changes are decreasing under the RCP2.6 scenario, but the trend is not statistically significant. In the mid and far-future periods under the RCP4.5 scenario, there is a statistical significant decreasing trend in runoff; however, the decreasing variation in the near future is not significant. In the near, mid, and far future under the RCP6.0, runoff variations are declining, but the trend is not statistically significant. In the far-future period, under the RCP8.5, there is a significant decreasing trend; however, in the near and mid-future, runoff declining changes are not statistically significant. Reduced rainfall and increased temperature in the watershed will reduce the rate of runoff in the future periods in such a way that the security of the inhabitants of the region will be severely affected.
4- Conclusions
Results of evaluation criteria [R2 and NS] showed that the SWAT performance for the simulation of runoff in the Gorganroud watershed was not satisfactory, but it was in an acceptable range. Climate change simulation indicated a decreasing trend for rainfall in all future periods, but this trend was not statistically significant. The temperature variable in all RCPs had an increasing trend. However, temperature trend analysis under the RCP4.5 scenario during the near and mid- future and under the RCP6.0 scenario during the near, mid, and far-future showed a significant upward trend. Runoff under the RCP4.5 scenario during the mid to far-future and under the RCP8.5 scenario during

 
the far-future period followed a significant downward trend. Runoff during the near-future period under the RCP4.5 scenario and throughout the near to mid-future under the RCP8.5 scenario, had declining variations, but its trend was not statistically significant. In general, these results indicated that the amount of temperature will follow an increasing tendency; while rainfall and runoff will follow a decreasing movement in this watershed by the end of the 21st century.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Climate Change
  • Emission scenario
  • Fifth assessment report
  • Mann-kendall test
  • Soil and Water Assessment Tool [SWAT]
  • Gorganroud
  • Gholestan Province
 
Abbaspour, K. C. (2007). User manual for SWAT-CUP, SWAT calibration and uncertainty analysis programs. Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Eawag, Duebendorf, Switzerland93.
Abbaspour, K. C., Rouholahnejad, E., Vaghefi, S. R. I. N. I. V. A. S. A. N. B., Srinivasan, R., Yang, H., & Kløve, B. (2015). A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model. Journal of Hydrology524, 733-752.
Afshar, A. A., Hasanzadeh, Y., Besalatpour, A. A., & Pourreza-Bilondi, M. (2017). Climate change forecasting in a mountainous data scarce watershed using CMIP5 models under representative concentration pathways. Theoretical and Applied Climatology129(1-2), 683-699.
Ahmed, K. F., Wang, G., Silander, J., Wilson, A. M., Allen, J. M., Horton, R., & Anyah, R. (2013). Statistical downscaling and bias correction of climate model outputs for climate change impact assessment in the US northeast. Global and Planetary Change100, 320-332.
Akurut, M., Willems, P. & Niwagaba CB.  2014. Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Precipitation over Lake ictoria, East Africa, in the 21st Century, Journal of Water, , 6 (9), 2634-2659.
Brekke, L., Thrasher, B. L., Maurer, E. P., & Pruitt, T. (2013). Downscaled CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate projections: release of downscaled CMIP5 climate projections, comparison with preceding information, and summary of user needs. Technical Service Center, Bureau of Reclamation, US Department of the Interior, Denver, CO1.
Chong-Hai, X. U., & Ying, X. (2012). The projection of temperature and precipitation over China under RCP scenarios using a CMIP5 multi-model ensemble. Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters5(6), 527-533.
Cronshey, R. (1986). Urban hydrology for small watersheds. US Dept. of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Engineering Division.
Donyaii, A., & Sarraf, A. (2020). Optimization of Reservoir Operation using a Bioinspired Metaheuristic Based on the COVID-19 Propagation Model. Numerical Methods in Civil Engineering Journal, 5 (1) :15-28.
Donyaii A., Sarraf, A. & Ahmadi, H. (2020a). A Novel Approach to Supply the Water Reservoir Demand Based on a Hybrid Whale Optimization Algorithm. Shock and Vibration, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8833866.
Donyaii A., Sarraf, A. & Ahmadi, H. (2021).  Comparison of meta-heuristic algorithms in optimum operation of a single-reservoir dam system. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability, https://doi.org/10.1680/jensu.20.00065.
Donyaii, A., & Sarraf, A. (2019). Analysis of future climatic parameters in Gorganrood catchment area with a new approach to the latest changes in the IPCC report, proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Applied Research in Science and Engineering, vrije universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
Donyaii, A., Sarraf, A., & Ahmadi, H. (2020b). Application of a new approach in optimizing the operation of the multi-objective reservoir. Journal of Hydraulic Structures6(3), 1-20. doi: 10.22055/jhs.2020.34556.1145.
Donyaii, A., Sarraf, A., & Ahmadi, H. (2020c). Water reservoir Multi-objective optimal operation using Grey Wolf optimizer. Shock and Vibrationhttps://doi.org/ 10.1155/2020/8870464.
Gebre, S. L., & Ludwig, F. (2015). Hydrological response to climate change of the upper Blue Nile River Basin: based on IPCC fifth assessment report (AR5). Journal of Climatology & Weather Forecasting3(01), 1-15.
Ghorbani, M. A., Hosseini, S. H., H Kashan, M., & Abbasi, H. (2015). Evaluation of Alavian Reservoir Operation Performance under the Condition of Future Climate Change. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering45(79), 59-72.
Goodarzi, M. & Fatehifar, A. 2019. Statistical Distributions Analysis for Estimating of Climate Change Effects on Future Floods (Case Study: Azarshahrchay Basin). Hydrogeomorphology, 6(20), 57-78.
Jahanbakhsh Asl, S., Khorshiddoust, A., Alinejad, M. & Pourasghr, F. (2016). Impact of Climate Change on Precipitation and Temperature by Taking the Uncertainty of Models and Climate Scenarios (Case Study: Shahrchay Basin in Urmia). Hydrogeomorphology, 3(7), 107-122.
Jajarmizadeh, M., Harun, S., Ghahraman, B., & Mokhtari, M. H. (2012). Modeling daily stream flow using plant evapotranspiration method. International Journal of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering4(6), 218-226.
Javan, K., Saleh, F. N., & Shahraiyni, H. T. (2013). The influences of climate change on the runoff of Gharehsoo River Watershed. American Journal of Climate Change2013.
Kendall, M. (1975). Rank correlation methods (4th edn.) charles griffin. San Francisco, CA8.
Mann, H. B. (1945). Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 245-259.
Masood, M., Yeh, PJF., Hanasaki, N. & Takeuchi, K. 2015. Model study of the impacts of future climate change on the hydrology of Ganges–Brahmaputra-Meghna basin. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2015, 19 (2), 747-770.
Memarian, H., Balasundram, S. K., Abbaspour, K. C., Talib, J. B., Boon Sung, C. T., & Sood, A. M. (2014). SWAT-based hydrological modelling of tropical land-use scenarios. Hydrological Sciences Journal59(10), 1808-1829.
Mirzaee, N., & Sarraf, A. (2021). Application of Data Fusion Models in River Flow Simulation Using Signals of Large-Scale Climate (Case Study: Jiroft Dam Basin), Journal of Watershed Engineering and Management, https://doi.org/10.22092/ijwmse.2021.343547.1816.
Moazami Goudarzi, F., Sarraf, A. & Ahmadi, H. (2020). Assessment of SM2RAIN-ASCAT and CMORPH Satellite Precipitation Products Over Maharlu Lake Basin in Iran, Water Supply, (2020) 20 (5): 1799-1806.
Moazami Goudarzi, F., Sarraf, A. & Ahmadi, H. (2020). Prediction of Runoff Within Maharlu Basin for Future 60 Years Using RCP Scenarios, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, (2020) 13: 605, 1-17.
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., & Veith, T. L. (2007). Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE50(3), 885-900.
Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology10(3), 282-290.
Rostamian, R., Jaleh, A., Afyuni, M., Mousavi, S. F., Heidarpour, M., Jalalian, A., & Abbaspour, K. C. (2008). Application of a SWAT model for estimating runoff and sediment in two mountainous basins in central Iran. Hydrological Sciences Journal53(5), 977-988.
Shafiei, M., Ansari, H., Davari, K., & Ghahraman, B. (2013). Calibration and uncertainty analysis of a semi-distributed model in a semi-arid region, case study: Nishabour watershed. JWSS-Isfahan University of Technology17(64), 137-149.
Shanley, C. S., Pyare, S., Goldstein, M. I., Alaback, P. B., Albert, D. M., Beier, C. M., ... & McPhee, M. V. (2015). Climate change implications in the northern coastal temperate rainforest of North America. Climatic Change130(2), 155-170.
Soleimanipour M, Sarraf A. P. (2021). Evaluating the effects of climate change on Lar Basin Water Resources Using SWAT Model and comparing its results with Bayesian Networks and Hybrid Intelligent Models. Journal of Natural Geography, 13 (50), 61-79.
Solomon, S., Manning, M., Marquis, M., & Qin, D. (2007). Climate change 2007-the physical science basis: Working Group I Contribution to the fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC (Vol. 4). Cambridge University press.
Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G. K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., ... & Alexander, L. V. (2013). Climate Change 2013. The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change-Abstract for decision-makers; Changements climatiques 2013. Les elements scientifiques. Contribution du groupe de travail I au cinquieme rapport d'evaluation du groupe d'experts intergouvernemental sur l'evolution du CLIMAT-Resume a l'intention des decideurs.
Telmer, K., Bonham-Carter, G. F., Kliza, D. A., & Hall, G. E. (2004). The atmospheric transport and deposition of smelter emissions: Evidence from the multi-element geochemistry of snow, Quebec, Canada. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta68(14), 2961-2980.
Van Vuuren, D. P., Edmonds, J., Kainuma, M., Riahi, K., Thomson, A., Hibbard, K., & Masui, T. (2011). The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Climatic Change109(1-2), 5.