Document Type : پژوهشی

Authors

1 - Professor in Geomorphology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran, (Corresponding Author),

2 Professor in Geomorphology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Soil erosion is one of the most serious environmental degradation problems that adversely affects many natural and human-managed ecosystems. In agricultural watersheds, soil erosion not only removes nutrient-rich top soil on site, but also degrades water quality as a result of transported sediments off site. The estimation of soil erosion is often complicated due to the complex interplay of many factors such as climate, land cover, soil, topography, lithology, and human activities. Erosion models can be used as predictive tools for soil loss assessment, conservation planning, soil erosion inventories, and project planning. Moreover, models can be used as tools for understanding erosion processes and their impact. They are basically categorized into three types of empirical, conceptual, and physical based models. Empirical models are usually statistical in nature and generally applicable only to conditions for which the parameters have been calibrated. The commonly used empirical soil erosion models are USLE, RUSLE, and MUSLE. Soil erosion based- physical models include AGNPS, WEPP, SWAT, and the like. One of the most widely applied watershed models is SWAT which has been extensively used for simulating hydrologic and water quality processes in watersheds with a wide range of scales and environmental conditions. Iran is among the most affected

 

countries in the world in terms of the extent and intensity of soil erosion. Current estimates suggest that soil erosion in Iran is around 25 tons per hectare annually which is four times greater than the world average. In the Northwest of the country, the Sattarkhan Dam has been constructed on the Aharchay River, which is the source of drinking water, agriculture, and industry in the region. In the catchment area of the Sattarkhan Dam, which includes the Aharchay upstream, physical conditions such as being mountainous and the unstability of land management such as the spread of rainforests with plowing in the direction of gradient and developmental activities cause soil erosion, sediment production, damping reservoir capacity reduction and increasing reservoir sedimentation costs. The goal of this study was to model and evaluate the spatial distribution of soil erosion in the Sattarkhan Dam basin. In this study, Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and MUSLE models were served for simulating sediment yield and identifying critical areas of soil erosion in the Sattarkhan Dam basin, located in the North West of Iran.
Methodology
The SWAT model is a continuous-time, semi-distributed, process-based river basin or watershed scale model. It was developed to predict the impact of land management practices on water, sediment and chemical yields in agricultural watersheds with varying soils, land use, and management conditions over a long period of time. It divides a watershed into sub watersheds. Each sub watershed is connected through a stream channel. In addition, each sub watershed is divided into Hydrologic Response Unit (HRU). HRU is a unique combination of soil, land use, and slope type in a sub watershed. SWAT predicts the sediment yield within each HRU using Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (MUSEL). Sequential Uncertainty Fitting-2 (SUFI-2), a SWAT-CUP2012 sub-module computer program, was applied to optimize the parameters of the SWAT using monthly observed sediment yield data at a monitoring site in the Sattarkhan Dam basin. In this study, sediment discharges data series during 2004-2009 and 2010-2013 were respectively used for model calibration and validation. To

 
 evaluate model performance, the statistical methods consisted of the determination coefficient (R2), Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient (NS), and root mean square error observations standard deviation ratio (RSR).
Results and Discussion
Seven highly sensitive parameters were recognized for sediment yield simulation including CN2, ESCO, CH_K2, SMFMN, CH_N2, PRF, and USLE_K.  The calibration outputs for simulation showed a very good model performance for sediment yield where the values of R2, NS and RSR were respectively 0.76, 0.95, and 0.06. During the validation period, the annual sediment yield simulation of R2, NS, and RSR values were respectively 0.96, 0.93, and 0.1. Also, the results showed that the spatial pattern of the regions differed in terms of the erosion and sediment production. The critical areas were located in the upper part of the basin and sediment production was very high and high, which included about 34.15% of the area of the Sattarkhan Dam basin.
Conclution
 This study showed that the SWAT model is competent of predicting sediment yields and, hence, can be used as a tool for water resource planning and management in the study watershed. The prediction of sediment yield at ungauged watershed with SWAT could be possible under comparable topography, land use, soil management, climate condition for the purpose of soil erosion assessment, scenario analysis, and recommendation of best management practices to support watershed management initiatives in the semi-dry mountainous regions of Iran.

Highlights

-

Keywords

References
-Abbaspour, K.C., Vejdani, M., Haghighat, S., (2007), SWATCUP Calibration and Uncertainty Programs for SWAT. In: Oxley, L., Kulasiri, D. (Eds.), Proc. Intl. Congress on Modeling and Simulation (MODSIM'07). Modeling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, Melbourne, Australia, PP. 1603–1609.
-Arnold, J.G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R.S. and   Williams, J.R. (1998), Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development. J .American Water Resources Association,Vol. 34, No.1, PP.73-89.
-Ayele, G.T., Teshale, E.Z., Yu, B., Rutherfurd, I.D.,Jeong, J. (2017), Streamflow and Sediment Yield Prediction for Watershed Prioritization in the Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia, Water, Vol.9, No,782, PP. 1-29.
-Betrie, G.D., Mohammed, Y.A., Griensven, A.V., R. Srinivasan. (2011), Sediment management modelling in the Blue Nile Basin using SWAT model. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 15, PP.807–818.
-Briak, H., Moussadek, R., Aboumaria, KH., Mrabet, R., (2016), Assessing sediment yield in Kalaya gauge dwatershed (Northern Morocco) using GIS and SWAT model, International Soil and Water Conservation Research,No.4, PP. 177- 185.
-Duru, U., Arabi, M., Whol, E., (2018), Modeling stream flow and sediment yield using the SWAT model: a case study of Ankara River basin, Turkey, Journal Physical Geography, Vol,39, No. 3, PP. 264-289.
-Gull, S., MA, A., Dar, A. M., (2017), Prediction of Stream Flow and Sediment Yield of Lolab Watershed Using SWAT Model.  Hydrology Current Research, Vol.8, No.1, PP. 1-9.
-Merritt, W.S., Letcher, R.A., Jakeman, A.J. (2003), A review of erosion and sediment transport models. Environmental modelling and Software, No.18, PP. 761-799.
-Moriasi, D.N.; Arnold, J.G.; Van Liew, M.W.; Bingner, R.L.; Harmel, R.D.; Veith, T.L. (2007), Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. ASABE, No.50, PP. 885–900.
-Muche, H., Temesgen, M., Yimer, F., (2013), Soil loss prediction using USLE and MUSLE under conservation tillage integrated with ‘fanya juus’ in Choke Mountain, Ethiopia, International Journal of Agricultural Sciences,Vol. 3, No.10, PP. 046-052.
-Nash, J.E.; Sutcliffe, J. (1970), River flow forecasting through conceptual models: Part I. A discussion of principle. J. Hydrol, No. 10, PP. 282–290.
-Pandey, A.; Himanshu, S.K.; Mishra, S.; Singh, V.P. (2016), Physically based soil erosion and sediment yield models revisited. Catena, No. 147, PP.595–620.
-Patrick Laceby, J., McMahon, J., Evrard, O., Olley, J. (2015), A Comparison of geological and statistical approaches to element selection for sediment fingerprinting, Soils Sediments, No.15, PP.2117–2131.
-Tran Thi Phuong, Chau Vo Trung Thong, Nguyen Bich Ngoc, Huynh Van Chuong, (2014), Modeling Soil Erosion within Small Moutainous Watershed in Central Vietnam Using GIS and SWAT, Resources and Environment,Vol.4, No.3, PP. 139-147.
-Tyagi, J.V., Rai, S.P., Qaz, N., Singh, M.P. (2014), Assessment of discharge and sediment transport from different forest cover types in lower Himalaya using Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). International Journal of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 1, PP. 49-66.
-Yesuf, H.M., Assen, M., Alamirew, T., Melesse, A.M., (2015), Modeling of sediment yield in Maybar gauged watershed using SWAT, northeast Ethiopia, Catena, No.127, PP. 191-205.
-Zare Garizi, A., Talebi, A., (2016), Identification of critical sediment source areas across the Gharesou watershed, Northeastern Iran, using hydrological modeling, Environmental Resources Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, PP. 1-25.