نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه تبریز،دانشکده برنامه ریزی و علوم محیطی گروه ژئومورفولوژی

2 استاد گروه ژئومورفولوژی ، دانشکده برنامه ریزی و علوم محیطی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

چکیده

چکیده

مخروط ‌افکنه‌ها از جمله مناطق مستعد وقوع مخاطرات ژئومورفولوژیکی هستند. یکی از این مخاطرات روانگرایی می‌باشد که هدف اصلی این پژوهش بررسی این پدیده در سطح مخروط ‌افکنه لیلان واقع در شمال غرب ایران بوده است. جهت تهیه نقشه پتانسیل خطر وقوع روانگرایی از مدل ترکیبی FUZZY-VIKOR و تکنیک GIS استفاده شده است. پارامترهای مورد استفاده در این تحقیق عبارت بودند از: شیب، عمق آب زیرزمینی، نوع خاک و لرزه‌خیزی. لایه‌های اطلاعاتی هر یک از این پارامترها در محیط نرم‌افزار ArcGIS تهیه شدند. در ادامه جهت استانداردسازی لایه‌ها از مدل فازی استفاده گردید. در پایان وزن دهی پارامترها با روش ویکور انجام شد. نتایج وزن دهی پارامترها با روش ویکور نشان داد که دو پارامتر خاک و عمق آب زیرزمینی به ترتیب با وزن 442/0، 236/0 بیشترین ضریب اهمیت را کسب کرده‌اند که نشان‌دهنده اهمیت این پارامترها در خطر وقوع روانگرایی در سطح منطقه می‌باشد. نقشه نهایی با هم‌پوشانی لایه‌ها و ضرب وزن نهایی معیارها در هر لایه در 5 طبقه از پتانسیل خیلی کم تا خیلی زیاد تهیه گردید. نتایج بررسی مساحت هر یک از طبقات خطر نشان داد که 28/0 درصد از مساحت منطقه در طبقه خیلی زیاد و 70 درصد نیز در طبقه زیاد از نظر خطر وقوع روانگرایی قرار دارد. به‌طور عمده مناطق با پتانسیل خطر بالا در قسمت‌های پایین‌دست منطقه قرار دارند. این مناطق از نظر عمق آب زیرزمینی، بافت خاک و شیب مستعد وقوع خطر روانگرایی می‌باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Assessment and Zoning of Liquefaction Hazard Using FUZZY-VIKOR model, Case study: Leilan Alluvial Fan in Northwest of Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • somayyeh moazzez 1
  • Davoud Mokhtari 2
  • Mohammad hossein Rezai Moghadam 2

1 tabriz university

2 Professor, Department of Geomorphology, Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Abstract

Alluvial fans are among the areas prone to geomorphological hazards. One of these hazards is liquefaction, which the main purpose of this research was to investigate this phenomenon in the surface of the alluvial fan. The FUZZY-VIKOR combined model and GIS technique were used to prepare the liquefaction risk potential map. The used parameters in this research were: slope, depth of underground water, type of soil and seismicity. The information layers of each of these parameters were prepared in the ArcGIS software environment. Next, the fuzzy model was used to standardize the layers. At the end, the weighting of the parameters was done by Vikor method. . The results of weighting the parameters by Vikor method showed soil and depth of underground water have obtained the highest importance coefficient with the weight of 0.442 and 0.236 respectively. The final map was prepared by overlapping the layers and multiplying the final weight of the criteria in each layer in 5 classes from very low to very high potential. The final map was prepared by overlapping the layers and multiplying the final weight of the criteria in each layer in 5 classes from very low to very high potential. The results of examining the area of each risk class showed that 0.28% of the area is in the very high class and 70% is in the high class in terms of the risk of liquefaction. Mainly, the areas with high risk potential are located in the downstream parts of the region.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: alluvial fan
  • geomorphological hazards
  • FUZZY-VIKOR
  • liquefaction
  • Leilan alluvial fan
 
Amini Faskhudi, Abbas. (2005). Application of fuzzy logic inference in regional planning and development studies, Knowledge and development magazine, 17, 61- 39.
Askari, F., & Kasaei, M. (2003). Evaluating the potential of Liquefaction in the part of the southeastern areas of Tehran, Journal of the College of Engineering, vol 37, issue2.
Askari, F., Gerivani, H., & Haghshenas, E. (2009). Liquefaction hazard zonation in Qeshm island and microzonation in Qeshm and Dargahan towns, Journal of Iranian Association of Engineering Geology, 2, 3& 4, 53-68.
Beroya, M.A.A., & Aydin, A. (2010). A new approach to liquefaction hazard zonation: Application to Laoag City Northern Philippines, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30, 1338–1351.
El-Santawy, MF. (2012). A VIKOR Method for Solving Personnel Training Selection Problem, International Journal of Computing Science, 1,2, 9-12.
 Entezari, M., Khosravi, S., & Ahmadabadi, A. (2016). Zoning Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential Using VIKOR Model (Case Study: South West of Tehran), Geographical Researches, 31, 1, 157-169.
Ghaedrahmati, S., Bastanifar, I., & Soltani, L. (2011). A Survey of Density Effect on the Vulnerability of Earthquake in Isfahan City (Fuzzy Approach), Geography and Environmental planning, 22, 1, 107-122.
Ghasemi Ghorbandi, M. (2011). Microzonation of liquefaction risk in Bandar Abbas beaches, Master's thesis, Shahrood University of Technology, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Department of Hydrology and Environmental Geology.
Hajiani Boushehrian, A., & Zare, M. (2018).  Boushehr Liquefaction Hazard Zonation Based on SPT and Result Presentation by Using GIS Plat Form, Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 48,3, 109-119.
Holzer, T.L., Noce, T.E., & Bennett, M.J. (2010). Liquefaction probability curves for surficialgeologic deposits, Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, XVII (1), 1–21.
Ilanloo, M. (2011). A comparative study of fuzzy logic approach for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS: Anexperience of Karaj dam basin in Iran.Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 19, 668-676.
Iwasaki, T., Tokida, K., Tatsuoka, F., Watanabe, S., Yasuda, S., & Sato, H. (1982). Microzonation for soil liquefaction potential using simplified methods, Proc. 3 rd Int. Conf. On Microzonation, Seattle, 3, 1319 -1330.
 Karami , A., &  Abdshahi , A. (2011). Ranking of Townships in Kohgiloyeh and Boyerahmad Province in terms of Development using Fuzzy Approach, Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, Volume 3, Issue 11 - Serial ,Pages 117-136.
Matkan, A, A., Shakiba, A., Seyyed Hoseinpour,A., & Nazmfar, H. ( 2009).  Locating appropriate areas for burying waste using GIS (study area: Tabriz city), Environmental sciences, 6, 2, 121-132.
Mir Hosseini, S, M., & Kari, M. (2001). Preliminary micro-zoning of areas prone to liquefaction in Tehran, The National Research Program, International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering.
Mohammad Hosseini, S.M., & Mosalmanzadeh,A. (2004). Interaction of Sheet Pile Quay walls and the Liquefied Backfill Soils Electronic, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 9, (EJGE).
Momeni, M. (2007). New topics of research in operations, Tehran, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, second edition.
Mostafazadeh, R., Ong, M., & Mustafa, M. (2006). Using SWM model and GIS tools to assess liquefaction risk in cities located in the southern plains of Gorgan River, Golestan Province, National Earthquake and Building Retrofit Conference, Behbahan, Behbahan Islamic Azad University.
Pourghasemi, H R., Moradi, H R., & Fatemi Aghda S M. (2009). Landslide Hazard Assessment Using Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision- Making Method, 3 ,8, 51-62.
president deputy strategic planning and control. (2013). Soil liquefaction potential evaluation guide, consequences and ways of reducing their hazards, Publication No. 525.
Rashidian, V., & Gillins, D T. (2017). Modification of the liquefaction potential index to consider the topography in Christchurch, New Zealand, Engineering Geology.
Rezaei Moghaddam, M H., Mokhtari, D.,& Shafieimehr, M. (2021). Zoning flood risk in the Shahr Chai Watershed in Miyaneh using Vikor model, Hydrogeomorphology, 8, 28, 19-37.  
Safari, A., Sasanpour, F., & Musa Vand, Jafar. (2011). assessment of Vulnerability in urban areas against flood Hazard using geographic information system and fuzzy logic, Journal of Applied Researches in Geographical Sciences, 20, 129- 150.
Salari, M., Moazed, H., &Radmanesh, F. (2011). Locating urban waste landfill using AHP-FUZZY model in GIS environment (case study: Shiraz city), The Journal of Toloo –e- behdasht, 1.
Seed, H. B., & Idriss, I. M. (1982). Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Monograph Oakland, Calif.
Seed, H. B., Idriss, I. M., & Arango, I. (1983). Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential Using Field Performance Data, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 109 (3), 458-482.
Seed, H.B., & Idriss, I.M. (1971). Simplifed procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential, J. Geotech. Eng. ASCE 97, 1249–1273.
Sekvand, H., Shayan, S., & Sharifi Kia, M. (2011). Silakhor Plain Liquefaction Hazard Zonation, Journal of Applied Researches in Geographical Sciences, 21.
Sharifi-Mooda, M., Daniel T., Gillinsb, Kevin W., Frankec, Jasmyn N., Harperd,Steven J., Bartlette., & Michael J. Olsen. (2018). Probabilistic liquefaction-induced lateral spread hazard mapping and itsapplication to Utah County, Utah, Engineering Geology, 237,76-91.
Subedi, M., & Indra Prasad, A. (2022). Liquefaction hazard assessment and ground failure probability analysis in the Kathmandu Valley of Nepal, Geoenvironmental Disasters, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-021-00203-0.
UNISDR. (2009). Terminology on disaster risk reduction. United Nation, WHO.
Youd, T.L., & Hoose, S.N. (1977). Proceedings of the Sixth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Indian Society of Earthquake Technology, 2189–2194 .