نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه مهندسی عمران- هیدرولیک و مکانیک مهندسی رودخانه، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه ارومیه.

2 دانش‌آموخته، کارشناسی ارشد مهندسی منابع آب، دانشکده ی کشاورزی، دانشگاه زابل

3 استاد گروه مهندسی آب منابع آب، دانشکده ی کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز

4 دانشجوی دکترای مهندسی عمران- آب و سازه‌های هیدرولیکی، دانشکده‌ی فنی مهندسی، دانشگاه ارومیه

چکیده

مقاله با جریان سیل به­طور عمده ناشی از رواناب سطحی است که حاصل خصوصیات بارش و حوضه­ی آبریز است که در این میان، تأثیر پوشش گیاهی در کاهش جریان سیل حوضه‌های کوچک، کم‌تر از حوضه­های با مساحت زیاد می‌باشد. اولین گام در مطالعات اقتصادی طرح‌های مدیریت سیلاب، تهیه­ی نقشه‌های پهنه‌بندی سیل است. در این مقاله، رودخانه­ی باراندوزچای به عنوان رودخانه‌ای دائمی در حوضه­ی آبریز دریاچه­ی ارومیه که در معرض بارش‌های با شدت بالا قرار دارد، جهت پهنه‌بندی سیلاب دبی‌های حداکثر لحظه‌ای سالانه بین سال­های آبی 2013-1974 برای بازه­ی 3 کیلومتری بین دو ایستگاه اندازه­گیری در بالادست بی‌بکران و پایین‌‌دست دیزج در مسیر رودخانه مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. برای روندیابی هیدرولیکی سیل، ضریب زبری مانینگ مناسب، حاصل از متوسط‌گیری از ضرایب به مقادیر 0325/0 بالادست و 0301/0 پایین‌دست، در نرم‌افزار  HEC-RAS اجرا شده است. نتایج حاصل که شامل استخراج رقوم خطوط پهنه‌ها به کمک روش ماسکینگام-کونژ به ازای سیلاب‌های با دوره‌های بازگشت متفاوت می‌باشد. با تبدیل نتایج به ریسک متناظر هر دوره­ی بازگشت جهت ترسیم پهنه، از طریق الحاقیه Arc-Map HEC-geo-RAS وارد نرم‌افزار شده است تا پهنه‌های سیل مشخص شوند. خطوط هم‌ریسک به ازای دوره‌های 2 الی 75 سال ترسیم گردید که بیش‌ترین مساحت تحت پوشش سیلاب متعلق به دوره­ی بازگشت 1000 ساله به مقدار 34/97 هکتار بوده که دارای بیش‌ترین ریسک به مقدار 58/63% با عمر مفید 3 سال است. منحنی فرمان به کمک مساحت‌های تحت پوشش سیلاب در دوره‌های بازگشت متفاوت و عمر مفید متفاوت از فرمول ریسک به دست آمد که منجر به استخراج فرمول کلی مساحت-دوره-ریسک گردید.

تازه های تحقیق

-

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Derivation of Rule Curve for Flood Risk Zone A Case Study: Baranduz-Chay River

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mirali Mohammadi 1
  • Farnaz Mohammadi 2
  • Ahmad Fakherifard 3
  • Sajad Bijanvand 4

1 Associate prof. in Civil Eng. (Hydraulics & River Eng. Mechanics), Faculty of Eng., Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.

2 M.Sc. in Water Resources Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Water Eng., University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran

3 Professor in Water Resources, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Water Eng., University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

4 Ph.D. Candidate in Civil Engineering (Water & Hydraulic Structures Eng.), Dept. of Civil Eng., Faculty of Eng., Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

چکیده [English]

1- Introduction
Mainly the flood is caused by the surface runoff resulted from the properties of precipitation and river basin. The reduction of flooding by the effect of vegetation and soil in a small basin is less than a basin with a large area. Hence, to have a flood zoning map, the first step is studying economic flood management and flood control projects. This paper focuses on Baranduz-chay River as a case study, located in the Urmia lake basin. The river reach having 3 km long, was studied between two hydrology stations namely Bibakran at the upstream and Dizaj at the downstream. The annual peak discharge data of Baranduz-chay has surveyed during the years from 1974 to 2013, where the appropriate Manning roughness coefficient, n, by averaging 0.0325 as an upstream coefficient and 0.0301 as a downstream coefficient were both implemented in the HEC-RAS software and its result including floodplain zones elevation extraction by the Muskingum-Cunge method, based on the floods with different return periods obtained. After converting these zones to their corresponding risk for each return period time, it has been delineated in Arc-Map software through HEC-geo-RAS extension, floodplain zones were then defined. The maximum inundated

 

area is 97.34 Hectares and belongs to 1000 years return period which has the most risk as 63.58% within 3 years of useful periods. The Rule Curve is obtained by inundated areas with both different return and useful periods from the risk formula in which the general Area-Period-Risk formula was extracted.
Basically, the magnitude of the floods and their repetition over time is subject to rainfall intensity, permeability, and topographic conditions in the area. The occurrence of floods as one of the natural disasters that cause many financial losses in many parts of the world. The first step in economic studies of flood management or flood control is flood zoning. Flood zoning means the extent to which the flood covers the area. Today, via modern science and technology, human beings are trying to optimize designs and to reduce these costs. Therefore, it seems that flood zoning study in the permanent and seasonal rivers path appears to be of great importance by conducting case studies in vulnerable areas. ShahiriParsa et al. (2016: 55-62) used the integration of the HEC-RAS one-dimensional model and the two-dimensional CCHE2D model on the Sungai Maka river in the state of Kelanten, Malaysia. They concluded that in this case, some important factors are: Manning’s flow resistance coefficient, n, the geometric profile of the river section and the choice of the most suitable flood return period. The mentioned parameters have a major role in providing flood zoning outcome, which has caused the most changes in the geometric shape of the river section. Their results showed that the greatest difference between the models was 6% in the location of the meandering rivers. The results of both models were also consistent in most of the transverse sections, and, due to the difference in the shape of the rivers, the greatest difference was the difference between the two models. Sung et al. (2011: 1-12) used the Maskingum method to process unqualified basins by analyzing the HEC-HMS hydrologic model and the HEC-geo-HMS geo-hydrologic model, the extraction of sub-basins and characteristics of the basin was extracted. The results showed that the percentage of flood events proportional to the maximum discharge errors of a moment of less than 20% and a runoff volume of less than 10% to reaches 100%.

 

2- Methodology
Baranduz-chay river as the main river and permanent water catchment area of the study area. It originates from the highlands of Iran and Turkey border. The catchment area of this riverside in Saatlu is about 666 square kilometers and in Babarood is 1012 square kilometers. This research was associated with a similar risk due to the risk relationship with different return periods for the restricted areas around the river, based on different return periods. To determine risk areas or certain return periods, peak discharges were fitted with the best statistical distribution and through that, peak discharges were then calculated with different return periods and each of them was determined along the river and its expansion area.

3- Results and discussion
Fig. 3, shows the risk versus area (A, RISK), the risk with a downward trend, which means that the area risk is decreasing with the area covered by the risk area. By fitting a variety of exponential, linear, logarithmic, polynomial and power statistical functions, among those functions as shown in Fig. 3, risks with different useful lives are plotted simultaneously and from among functions, the power function was selected as a suitable fit function in order to obtain the general probabilistic distribution function and its parameters based on different useful life.
 
Fig. (3) Risk diagram versus area (Rule Curve) with a different useful life

 
4- Conclusions
For the Manning roughness coefficient, n, in the hydraulic model, the Manning’s n for the upstream and downstream stations were computed. The roughness coefficients, n, were then obtained for the upstream and downstream stations as 0.0325 and 0.0301, respectively. In order to obtain the corresponding risks for the areas covered by a flood of 3 km long from the Baranduz-chay between the upstream Bibakaran station and the lower reaches of the Hoerl's model, which is a type of power function. The risk-space-period curve for the specified periods is 2, 3, 5, 10, 25, 35 and 75 years (for more details, see Mohammadi, 2016).

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Rule Curve
  • Iso Risk Curves
  • Muskingum Cunge Method
  • and Baranduz chay
 
Abedini, M., Fathi, M., (2015). Flood Risk Mapping and Evaluation by using the Analytic Network Process Case Study: (Khiav Chai Catchment), Journal of Hydrogeomorphology, 1(3), 99-120.
Ackerman, C.T., (2005). HEC-GeoRAS: GIS Tools for Support of HEC-RAS Using ArcGIS, User Manual Version 4, US Army Corps of Engineers; Available at:http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-ras/documents/HEC-GeoRAS4_UsersManual.pdf.
Amirahmadi, A., Mohammadnia, M. and Golshani. N., (2015). Sensitivity analysis of geomorphological variables affecting floods using HEC-HMS model (Case Study: Zarcheshmeh Honjan - Isfahan Province), Journal of Hydrogeomorphology, 3, 21-41.
Altinakar, M., Kiedrzynska, E., Magnuszewski, A., (2006). Modelling of inundation patterns on the Pilica River flood plain, Poland, IAHS Publ, 308, 579.
Bennett, T.H., Walton, R., Dickerson, P.D., Howard, J.W., (2004). Comparison of HEC-RAS and MIKE11 unsteady flow modeling for the Tillamook Valley, Bridges, 10(40737), 182.
Brunner, G.W., (2010). HEC-RAS River Analysis System, Hydraulic Reference Manual, Version 4.1. Davis, CA: US Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Hydrologic Engineering Center.
Chithra, M. and Sumam, K.S., (2013). Flood Risk Assessment by GIS and Hydraulic Model. Proceedings of International Conference on Materials for the Future -Innovative Materials, Processes, Products and Applications, November 2013, 315-318.
Els, Z., (2013). Data Availability and Requirements for Flood Hazard Mapping, PositionIT, Master of Natural Sciences at Stellenbosch University.
Fan, C., Ko, C-H, Wang, W-S., (2009). An innovative modeling approach using Qual2K and HEC-RAS integration to assess the impact of tidal effect on River Water quality simulation, J Environ Manage. 90(5), 1824–1832.
Gibson, S.A., Little, C., (2006). Implementation of the sediment impact assessment model (SIAM) in HEC-RAS., Paper presented at: 8th Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference, Reno, NV.
Gibson, S., Pak, J., Fleming, M., (2010). Modeling watershed and riverine sediment processes with HEC-HMS and HEC-RAS, Paper presented at: Watershed Management Conference, Davis, CA.
Gilles, D., Moore, M., (2010). Review of Hydraulic Flood Modeling Software Used in Belgium, The Netherlands, and The United Kingdom. International Perspectives in Water Resources Management, Iowa City, IA.
Hasan, Z.A., AbGhani, A., Zakaria, N., (2007). Application of 2-D Modelling for Muda River Using CCHE2D. Paper presented at: International Conference on Managing Rivers in the 21st Century: Solution towards Sustainable River Basins, Riverside Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia.
Hasan, Z.A., Hamidon, N., Zakaria, N., Ghani, A.A., Siang, L.C., (2009). Incoperating GIS in Water Resources Modelling: Application of SWAT 2005 Model in Sungai Kurau, Perak and CCHE2D Model in Tasik Harapan USM, A River Engineering and Urban Drainage Research Center (REDAC), Penang.
Hasan, Z.A., Lee, K.H., Azamathulla, H.M., Ghani, A.A., (2011). Flow simulation for Lake Harapan using CCHE2D—a case study, Int J Modell Simul, 31(1), 85.
Jia, Y., Wang, S.S., (2001). CCHE2D: Two-dimensional hydrodynamic and sediment transport model for unsteady open channel flows over loose bed. National Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering, Technical Report No. NCCHE-TR-2001-1, February.
Khan, A.A., Barkdoll, B., (2001). Two-dimensional depth-averaged models for flow simulation in river bends, Int J Comput Eng Sci, 2(03), 453–467.
Knebl, M., Yang, Z-L, Hutchison, K., Maidment, D., (2005). Regional scale flood modeling using NEXRAD rainfall, GIS, and HEC-HMS/RAS: a case study for the San Antonio River Basin Summer 2002 storm event. J Environ Manage, 75(4), 325–336.
Kraus, R., (2000). Floodplain Determination Using ArcView GIS and HEC-RAS. Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling Support with Geographic Information Systems, New York, NY: ESRI Press.
Lee, K.T., Ho, Y-H, Chyan, Y-J., (2006). Bridge blockage and overbank flow simulations using HEC-RAS in the Keelung River during the 2001 Nari typhoon, J Hydraul Eng., 132(3), 319–323.
Magnuszewski, A., Kiedrzyńska, E., Wagner-Łslash;otkowska, I., Zalewski, M., (2007). Numerical Modelling of Material Fluxes on the Floodplain Wetland of the Pilica River, Poland, Wetlands: Monitoring, Modelling and Management: 205–210.
Mohammadi, F., (2016). Hydraulically flood zoning by Muskingum-Cunge method (case study: Baranduz-chay river), Msc. Thesis in Water Resources Eng., Zabol University.
Mosaedi, A., Gharib, M., Najafinejad, A. and Yaghmaei, F., (2007). Flood Hazard Zonation and Assessment (case study- Ramian suburbs-Iran), Journal of the Iranian Natural Res., 60(3), 2007, 785-797
Nassar, M., (2011). Multi-parametric sensitivity analysis of CCHE2D for channel flow simulations in Nile River, J Hydro Environ Res., 5(3), 187–195.3.
Oladghaffari, A. Fakheri-Fard, A. Nazemi, AH. and Ghorbani, MA., (2010). Hydraulic Flood Routing Using Dynamic Wave Method and Comparison with Linear and Nonlinear Hydrologic Muskingum Routing Methods (Case Study: Lighvan-Chai), J. Water and Soil Science, Article 4, 20(3), Autumn, 47-60 [in Farsi]
Pistocchi, A., Mazzoli, P., (2002). Use of HEC-RAS and HEC-HMS models with ArcView for hydrologic risk management, Paper presented at: Proc. Conference IEMSS, Lugano, Switzerland.
Roshun, H., Vahabzadeh, Gh., Solaimani, K. and Farhadi, R., (2013). Simulation of River Hydraulics Behavior Using HEC-RAS Model in GIS Environment (Case Study: Beshar River, Kohgiloyeh and Boyerahmad Province), Journal of Watershed Management Research, 4th Year, No.7, 70-84.
Scott, S.H., Jia, Y., (2005). Simulation of sediment transport and channel morphology change in large river systems, US-China Workshop on Advanced Computational Modelling in Hydroscience & Engineering, Mississippi, USA.
ShahiriParsa, A. Heydari, M. Sadeghian, M. Moharrampour, M., (2013). Flood Zoning Simulation by HEC-RAS Model (Case Study: Johor River-Kota Tinggi Region), Journal of River Engineering 1(1).
ShahiriParsa, A. Noori, M. Heydari, M. and Rashidi, M., (2016). Floodplain Zoning Simulation by Using HEC-RAS and CCHE2D Models in the Sungai Maka River., Air, Soil and Water Research, February 14, 55-62.
Soleymani, M. Sadeghi, H. Khosrojerdi, A. Kaveh, F. and Babazadeh, H., (2014). Determining Flood Zones Using HEC-RAS Model (Case study: Gale Hecssan River situated in Atrak watershed). Academy for Environment and Life Sciences, India.
Song, X. Kong, F. and Zhu, Z., (2011). Application of Muskingum routing method with variable parameters in ungauged basin, Journal of Water Science and Engineering, 4(1), 1-12.
Tate, E.C., Maidment, D.R., (1999). Floodplain Mapping Using HEC-RAS and ArcView GIS, Austin: University of Texas.
Wu, W., Wang, S., (2002). Prediction of local scour of non-cohesive sediment around bridge piers using FVM-based CCHE2D Model, Paper presented at: First International Conference on Scour of Foundations, TEXAS, USA.
Yamani, M., Toorani, M., and Chezghe, S. (2012). Determination of the Flooding Zones by using HEC-RAS Model (Case Study: Upstream the Taleghan Dam). Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 1(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.22067/geo.v1i1.16519.
Zhu, T., Jia, Y., Altinakar, M.S., (2012). Study of potential impacts of radioactive contamination on drinking water quality in two collinear reservoirs using CCHE2D model, Paper presented at: ICHE Conference, Orlando, FL.